<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 971 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783431</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding additions made by the AO under s. 41(1) and for unexplained expenditure. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s own ledger reflected a reduction of trade liability towards a creditor by Rs. 1,97,48,195/-, with only Rs. 98 lakhs shown as outstanding, evidencing cessation of liability despite the assessee&#039;s denial of any waiver. No contrary documentary proof was produced. Further, the unexplained difference between purchases recorded in the stock register and in the profit and loss account remained unsubstantiated. ITAT therefore sustained the AO&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s orders in full and rejected all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 12:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 971 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783431</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding additions made by the AO under s. 41(1) and for unexplained expenditure. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s own ledger reflected a reduction of trade liability towards a creditor by Rs. 1,97,48,195/-, with only Rs. 98 lakhs shown as outstanding, evidencing cessation of liability despite the assessee&#039;s denial of any waiver. No contrary documentary proof was produced. Further, the unexplained difference between purchases recorded in the stock register and in the profit and loss account remained unsubstantiated. ITAT therefore sustained the AO&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s orders in full and rejected all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>