https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465293 SC allowed the appeal, set aside the HC and first appellate court decrees, and restored the trial court's findings. It held that the sale deed in favour of the appellant-defendant was validly executed, duly proved, registered, and not vitiated by undue influence or fraud, thereby extinguishing the mortgagor's equity of redemption by merger. The respondent-plaintiff failed to establish a valid oral gift under Mohammedan law, particularly delivery of possession and subsequent acts of ownership. SC further held that the courts below erred in treating the suit as a simple redemption action and in granting redemption and possession without complying with Order 34 Rules 7 and 8 CPC. The respondent-plaintiff's suit was consequently rejected. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Dec 2025 19:06:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465293 SC allowed the appeal, set aside the HC and first appellate court decrees, and restored the trial court's findings. It held that the sale deed in favour of the appellant-defendant was validly executed, duly proved, registered, and not vitiated by undue influence or fraud, thereby extinguishing the mortgagor's equity of redemption by merger. The respondent-plaintiff failed to establish a valid oral gift under Mohammedan law, particularly delivery of possession and subsequent acts of ownership. SC further held that the courts below erred in treating the suit as a simple redemption action and in granting redemption and possession without complying with Order 34 Rules 7 and 8 CPC. The respondent-plaintiff's suit was consequently rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465293