https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465291 SC, in a Central Excise dispute between a corporate assessee and the Union authorities, declined to interfere with the impugned HC judgment. After hearing both sides, SC found no ground warranting exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The effect is that the HC's decision on the assessee's excise liability and attendant consequences stands affirmed and attained finality, with no further relief available to the assessee in this round of litigation. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:38:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465291 SC, in a Central Excise dispute between a corporate assessee and the Union authorities, declined to interfere with the impugned HC judgment. After hearing both sides, SC found no ground warranting exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The effect is that the HC's decision on the assessee's excise liability and attendant consequences stands affirmed and attained finality, with no further relief available to the assessee in this round of litigation. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465291