<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 873 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783333</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s SLP, thereby affirming the HC&#039;s common order quashing the revised assessment orders passed against the dealer. The HC had held that the non-furnishing of the D3 report and related records, which formed the basis of the revised assessments, constituted a violation of principles of natural justice, particularly audi alteram partem, as the dealer was denied an effective opportunity to contest the material relied upon. SC found no error or perversity warranting interference under Article 136 and declined to reappreciate the factual findings of procedural unfairness. The HC&#039;s directions regarding the assessments thus stood confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:39:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 873 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783333</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s SLP, thereby affirming the HC&#039;s common order quashing the revised assessment orders passed against the dealer. The HC had held that the non-furnishing of the D3 report and related records, which formed the basis of the revised assessments, constituted a violation of principles of natural justice, particularly audi alteram partem, as the dealer was denied an effective opportunity to contest the material relied upon. SC found no error or perversity warranting interference under Article 136 and declined to reappreciate the factual findings of procedural unfairness. The HC&#039;s directions regarding the assessments thus stood confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>