https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783346 NCLAT permitted correction of the nomenclature of the pending "review application" to a "recall application," noting that the body of the application already described it as such, and found no necessity to direct NCLT to halt proceedings in the respondent's Section 7 IBC application, as both matters were listed imminently. On consideration of the recall prayer seeking to set aside NCLAT's earlier order and restore NCLT's dismissal of the Section 7 application, NCLAT held that the applicant was impermissibly attempting to re-open and scrutinize the judgment as if in appeal, particularly after having approached SC and then not pressing the appeal there. The recall application was dismissed on merits. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:39:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783346 NCLAT permitted correction of the nomenclature of the pending "review application" to a "recall application," noting that the body of the application already described it as such, and found no necessity to direct NCLT to halt proceedings in the respondent's Section 7 IBC application, as both matters were listed imminently. On consideration of the recall prayer seeking to set aside NCLAT's earlier order and restore NCLT's dismissal of the Section 7 application, NCLAT held that the applicant was impermissibly attempting to re-open and scrutinize the judgment as if in appeal, particularly after having approached SC and then not pressing the appeal there. The recall application was dismissed on merits. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783346