<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 890 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783350</link>
    <description>The AAR held the application maintainable and ruled that imported &quot;Nuclease-Free Water&quot; is classifiable under CTH 28539010 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as distilled or conductivity water or water of similar purity, by applying Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation of the Tariff. It accepted that the applicant&#039;s earlier classification as certified reference material was erroneous and that a fresh, correct interpretation of the tariff heading is a valid ground for reclassification. The authority reiterated that there is no estoppel against correct classification in tax matters and allowed change of the existing classification accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:39:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 890 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783350</link>
      <description>The AAR held the application maintainable and ruled that imported &quot;Nuclease-Free Water&quot; is classifiable under CTH 28539010 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as distilled or conductivity water or water of similar purity, by applying Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation of the Tariff. It accepted that the applicant&#039;s earlier classification as certified reference material was erroneous and that a fresh, correct interpretation of the tariff heading is a valid ground for reclassification. The authority reiterated that there is no estoppel against correct classification in tax matters and allowed change of the existing classification accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>