https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783365 The HC dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of an appeal before CESTAT that had been rejected for non-compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement of Rs. 5,00,000/-, despite the appellant's plea of financial hardship and the alleged high value of seized silver lying with Customs. The HC held that the appellant's identical prayer had already been rejected by the Allahabad HC and that a subsequent SLP against that order was entertained and dismissed by the SC. In these circumstances, the HC declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 and disposed of the appeal. en-us Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:39:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783365 The HC dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of an appeal before CESTAT that had been rejected for non-compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement of Rs. 5,00,000/-, despite the appellant's plea of financial hardship and the alleged high value of seized silver lying with Customs. The HC held that the appellant's identical prayer had already been rejected by the Allahabad HC and that a subsequent SLP against that order was entertained and dismissed by the SC. In these circumstances, the HC declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 and disposed of the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783365