<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 927 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783387</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition on alleged bogus purchases from SKTPL and restored the matter to the file of the AO/JAO for limited verification. The Tribunal noted fresh and voluminous evidence including transportation documents (delivery challans, lorry receipts), GST search and investigation reports, closure report, and proof of discharge of GST liability under DRC, which had not been examined earlier. Holding that the genuineness of purchases through SKTPL required detailed verification in light of this additional material, ITAT directed the AO/JAO to re-examine the transactions and decide afresh in accordance with law. Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:39:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 927 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783387</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition on alleged bogus purchases from SKTPL and restored the matter to the file of the AO/JAO for limited verification. The Tribunal noted fresh and voluminous evidence including transportation documents (delivery challans, lorry receipts), GST search and investigation reports, closure report, and proof of discharge of GST liability under DRC, which had not been examined earlier. Holding that the genuineness of purchases through SKTPL required detailed verification in light of this additional material, ITAT directed the AO/JAO to re-examine the transactions and decide afresh in accordance with law. Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>