<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 933 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783393</link>
    <description>Tax paid under CGST and SGST heads, though intended for IGST, must be reconsidered against the demand by treating the payments as discharge towards IGST. The existing orders were set aside because the tax payment details had not been properly reassessed. If reconciliation shows excess payment, refund is payable in terms of section 77 of the GST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:39:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 933 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783393</link>
      <description>Tax paid under CGST and SGST heads, though intended for IGST, must be reconsidered against the demand by treating the payments as discharge towards IGST. The existing orders were set aside because the tax payment details had not been properly reassessed. If reconciliation shows excess payment, refund is payable in terms of section 77 of the GST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>