<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 936 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783396</link>
    <description>HC set aside the impugned assessment order and consequential demand under the GST regime on the ground that it violated Section 75(7) of the Act. The show cause notice quantified a composite amount of tax, interest and penalty at Rs. 32,11,470/-, whereas the order raised a demand of Rs. 60,54,984/-, thereby exceeding the amount specified in the notice and introducing grounds beyond it, which is impermissible. The contention regarding lack of personal hearing was held immaterial once the petitioner&#039;s case was that it had no knowledge of the notice. The matter was remanded to the competent authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:39:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 936 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783396</link>
      <description>HC set aside the impugned assessment order and consequential demand under the GST regime on the ground that it violated Section 75(7) of the Act. The show cause notice quantified a composite amount of tax, interest and penalty at Rs. 32,11,470/-, whereas the order raised a demand of Rs. 60,54,984/-, thereby exceeding the amount specified in the notice and introducing grounds beyond it, which is impermissible. The contention regarding lack of personal hearing was held immaterial once the petitioner&#039;s case was that it had no knowledge of the notice. The matter was remanded to the competent authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>