<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 170 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48656</link>
    <description>The Authority confirmed the applicant&#039;s entitlement to the concession under C.E. Notification No. 8/2003 despite a high foreign equity percentage in a joint venture. Additionally, it clarified the conditions for claiming Credit of Counter Vailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) on imported machinery, emphasizing adherence to specified rules for credit utilization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 170 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48656</link>
      <description>The Authority confirmed the applicant&#039;s entitlement to the concession under C.E. Notification No. 8/2003 despite a high foreign equity percentage in a joint venture. Additionally, it clarified the conditions for claiming Credit of Counter Vailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) on imported machinery, emphasizing adherence to specified rules for credit utilization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>