https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465280 The ITAT Pune allowed the assessee-HUF's Miscellaneous Application and recalled its earlier ex parte order for A.Y. 2014-15. The Tribunal noted that the prior ex parte disposal followed repeated adjournment requests by the erstwhile counsel, who subsequently withdrew vakalatnama without the assessee's knowledge. Accepting the explanation of bona fide non-compliance and holding that a party should not be penalized for counsel's lapse, the ITAT directed de novo adjudication of the appeal. The Registry was instructed to list the matter before the "A" Bench on 08.07.2025 for fresh hearing. en-us Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 14 Dec 2025 11:30:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465280 The ITAT Pune allowed the assessee-HUF's Miscellaneous Application and recalled its earlier ex parte order for A.Y. 2014-15. The Tribunal noted that the prior ex parte disposal followed repeated adjournment requests by the erstwhile counsel, who subsequently withdrew vakalatnama without the assessee's knowledge. Accepting the explanation of bona fide non-compliance and holding that a party should not be penalized for counsel's lapse, the ITAT directed de novo adjudication of the appeal. The Registry was instructed to list the matter before the "A" Bench on 08.07.2025 for fresh hearing. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465280