<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 830 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783290</link>
    <description>The AAR held that the imported &quot;R&amp;S(r) CMA180 Radio Test Set&quot; is classifiable under CTI 9030 40 00 as an instrument &quot;specially designed for telecommunications.&quot; On examining its design, configuration, telecom-standard-specific features, and principal applications, the authority found it is engineered to test communication transceivers and two-way radios end-to-end, rather than being a general-purpose test instrument. Applying the principle that a specific tariff entry prevails over a residuary &quot;other&quot; category, the authority rejected the department&#039;s plea for classification under a general heading and ruled that recourse to a residuary entry is impermissible where a specific telecommunications entry applies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 08:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 830 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783290</link>
      <description>The AAR held that the imported &quot;R&amp;S(r) CMA180 Radio Test Set&quot; is classifiable under CTI 9030 40 00 as an instrument &quot;specially designed for telecommunications.&quot; On examining its design, configuration, telecom-standard-specific features, and principal applications, the authority found it is engineered to test communication transceivers and two-way radios end-to-end, rather than being a general-purpose test instrument. Applying the principle that a specific tariff entry prevails over a residuary &quot;other&quot; category, the authority rejected the department&#039;s plea for classification under a general heading and ruled that recourse to a residuary entry is impermissible where a specific telecommunications entry applies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>