<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 832 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783292</link>
    <description>A transferee of a genuinely issued replenishment licence cannot be saddled with customs duty merely because the original holder obtained the licence through forged supporting documents, unless the transferee was shown to be part of the fraud or the licence itself was forged; the licence remained valid during its currency and later cancellation did not retrospectively invalidate imports. Statements recorded under section 108 of the Customs Act could not be relied on in adjudication without compliance with section 138B, including examination of the maker and opportunity of cross-examination, so the adverse demand based on those statements was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 08:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 832 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783292</link>
      <description>A transferee of a genuinely issued replenishment licence cannot be saddled with customs duty merely because the original holder obtained the licence through forged supporting documents, unless the transferee was shown to be part of the fraud or the licence itself was forged; the licence remained valid during its currency and later cancellation did not retrospectively invalidate imports. Statements recorded under section 108 of the Customs Act could not be relied on in adjudication without compliance with section 138B, including examination of the maker and opportunity of cross-examination, so the adverse demand based on those statements was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>