<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 846 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783306</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s grounds on denial of deduction u/s 10B for non-maintenance of separate books, following earlier years and HC affirmation, and upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility. It sustained exclusion of certain functionally dissimilar comparables in the corporate support services segment for TP purposes. Relying on prior rulings, it held that disallowance u/s 14A cannot be added back while computing book profits u/s 115JB, rejecting Revenue&#039;s ground. For normal provisions, following jurisdictional HC in assessee&#039;s earlier years, it deleted the disallowance u/s 14A due to absence of valid AO satisfaction. The appeals were accordingly partly allowed/dismissed in line with these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 10:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 846 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783306</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s grounds on denial of deduction u/s 10B for non-maintenance of separate books, following earlier years and HC affirmation, and upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility. It sustained exclusion of certain functionally dissimilar comparables in the corporate support services segment for TP purposes. Relying on prior rulings, it held that disallowance u/s 14A cannot be added back while computing book profits u/s 115JB, rejecting Revenue&#039;s ground. For normal provisions, following jurisdictional HC in assessee&#039;s earlier years, it deleted the disallowance u/s 14A due to absence of valid AO satisfaction. The appeals were accordingly partly allowed/dismissed in line with these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>