<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 863 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783323</link>
    <description>The Special Leave Petition was disposed of after the Revenue and the assessee recorded a settlement. The Supreme Court left open, for consideration in an appropriate case, the question whether prosecution could be validly initiated. It also directed that the impugned judgment should not be treated as a precedent, limiting its use to the facts of that matter and preventing wider reliance on it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 08:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 863 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783323</link>
      <description>The Special Leave Petition was disposed of after the Revenue and the assessee recorded a settlement. The Supreme Court left open, for consideration in an appropriate case, the question whether prosecution could be validly initiated. It also directed that the impugned judgment should not be treated as a precedent, limiting its use to the facts of that matter and preventing wider reliance on it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>