<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1606 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465247</link>
    <description>HC held that the recovery suit, arising from a loan supported by a loan agreement, promissory note, receipt and post-dated cheques between two real estate businessmen, constitutes a &quot;commercial dispute&quot; under the Commercial Courts Act, as it involves ordinary mercantile transactions and an interest-bearing, non-friendly loan. Rejecting the defendant&#039;s jurisdictional objection, HC exercised powers under Order XIIIA CPC (as applicable to commercial disputes) and directed the defendant to deposit Rs. 4,50,00,000 in court within four weeks, failing which the defence shall stand closed and the plaintiff will be entitled to a money decree. The matter was also referred to Income Tax authorities for possible tax-evasion inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:19:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1606 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465247</link>
      <description>HC held that the recovery suit, arising from a loan supported by a loan agreement, promissory note, receipt and post-dated cheques between two real estate businessmen, constitutes a &quot;commercial dispute&quot; under the Commercial Courts Act, as it involves ordinary mercantile transactions and an interest-bearing, non-friendly loan. Rejecting the defendant&#039;s jurisdictional objection, HC exercised powers under Order XIIIA CPC (as applicable to commercial disputes) and directed the defendant to deposit Rs. 4,50,00,000 in court within four weeks, failing which the defence shall stand closed and the plaintiff will be entitled to a money decree. The matter was also referred to Income Tax authorities for possible tax-evasion inquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>