<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 97 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48637</link>
    <description>The Authority for Advance Rulings determined that the Submerged Passive Tilt Equalizer R4, Submerged Adjustable Slope Equalizer Unit R3, and Submerged Passive Equalizer Unit R2 are correctly classified under Tariff Heading 8517 50 99 of the Customs Tariff Act. The Authority rejected the Commissioner&#039;s argument for classification under a more general heading, emphasizing the specific role of these equalizers in submerged telecommunication systems.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 97 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48637</link>
      <description>The Authority for Advance Rulings determined that the Submerged Passive Tilt Equalizer R4, Submerged Adjustable Slope Equalizer Unit R3, and Submerged Passive Equalizer Unit R2 are correctly classified under Tariff Heading 8517 50 99 of the Customs Tariff Act. The Authority rejected the Commissioner&#039;s argument for classification under a more general heading, emphasizing the specific role of these equalizers in submerged telecommunication systems.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>