https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465252 Civil court jurisdiction is not barred where the pleadings go beyond rectification of the register of members and raise disputed title, allegations of fraudulent transfer, reduction of shareholding, and requests for declaratory and injunctive relief protecting individual shareholder rights. Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 was treated as confined to correction of entries in the register, while Section 430 does not exclude civil jurisdiction for controversies that the Tribunal is not empowered to determine. The plaint was therefore not liable to rejection on the basis of exclusive NCLT jurisdiction, and the civil suit was held maintainable. en-us Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:19:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465252 Civil court jurisdiction is not barred where the pleadings go beyond rectification of the register of members and raise disputed title, allegations of fraudulent transfer, reduction of shareholding, and requests for declaratory and injunctive relief protecting individual shareholder rights. Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 was treated as confined to correction of entries in the register, while Section 430 does not exclude civil jurisdiction for controversies that the Tribunal is not empowered to determine. The plaint was therefore not liable to rejection on the basis of exclusive NCLT jurisdiction, and the civil suit was held maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465252