<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1937 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465253</link>
    <description>Appeals were dismissed as not maintainable because the duty involved in each appeal was below the monetary threshold prescribed in the CBIC litigation policy circulars, which provide that no appeal should be filed before CESTAT where the duty amount is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and pending appeals in that category are to be withdrawn. The Tribunal therefore declined to examine the merits and disposed of the Revenue&#039;s 53 appeals on the threshold objection alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:50:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1937 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465253</link>
      <description>Appeals were dismissed as not maintainable because the duty involved in each appeal was below the monetary threshold prescribed in the CBIC litigation policy circulars, which provide that no appeal should be filed before CESTAT where the duty amount is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and pending appeals in that category are to be withdrawn. The Tribunal therefore declined to examine the merits and disposed of the Revenue&#039;s 53 appeals on the threshold objection alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>