https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465256 ITAT Pune-AT allowed the Revenue's miscellaneous application under s.254(2), holding that non-adjudication of Ground No. 5 in the Revenue's original appeal constituted a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal recalled its earlier order for A.Y. 2011-12 dated 09-01-2017, but strictly limited the recall to Ground No. 5 alone. All other findings and conclusions in the original order were expressly maintained as unaltered and unchanged. The Registry was directed to list the appeal for hearing on Ground No. 5 on the next available date and to issue fresh notices to the parties. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:19:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465256 ITAT Pune-AT allowed the Revenue's miscellaneous application under s.254(2), holding that non-adjudication of Ground No. 5 in the Revenue's original appeal constituted a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal recalled its earlier order for A.Y. 2011-12 dated 09-01-2017, but strictly limited the recall to Ground No. 5 alone. All other findings and conclusions in the original order were expressly maintained as unaltered and unchanged. The Registry was directed to list the appeal for hearing on Ground No. 5 on the next available date and to issue fresh notices to the parties. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465256