<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1344 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465258</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee-trust&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the order of the CIT(E) rejecting final registration under s. 80G. The Tribunal noted that the trust already held registration under s. 12AB and provisional registration under s. 80G(5), and that the genuineness of its charitable activities was not disputed. It held that denial of permanent registration solely due to an incorrect mention of the relevant sub-clause of s. 80G(5) was unjustified. Following a coordinate bench decision, ITAT remanded the matter to the CIT(E) with directions to consider the rectified application and pass a fresh order on merits, without being influenced by the earlier rejection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:19:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1344 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465258</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee-trust&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the order of the CIT(E) rejecting final registration under s. 80G. The Tribunal noted that the trust already held registration under s. 12AB and provisional registration under s. 80G(5), and that the genuineness of its charitable activities was not disputed. It held that denial of permanent registration solely due to an incorrect mention of the relevant sub-clause of s. 80G(5) was unjustified. Following a coordinate bench decision, ITAT remanded the matter to the CIT(E) with directions to consider the rectified application and pass a fresh order on merits, without being influenced by the earlier rejection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>