<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 94 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48634</link>
    <description>The Authority ruled that the submerged repeater, generic R4, is classifiable under Tariff Item 8517 50 99 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The decision was based on the technical characteristics and function of the product as an integral part of a submarine telecommunication system for data transmission. The ruling aligned with international classifications and World Customs Organization agreements, promoting consistency in customs tariff interpretation. The judgment was delivered on November 24, 2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 94 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48634</link>
      <description>The Authority ruled that the submerged repeater, generic R4, is classifiable under Tariff Item 8517 50 99 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The decision was based on the technical characteristics and function of the product as an integral part of a submarine telecommunication system for data transmission. The ruling aligned with international classifications and World Customs Organization agreements, promoting consistency in customs tariff interpretation. The judgment was delivered on November 24, 2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>