<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 109 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48625</link>
    <description>The application seeking an advance ruling on the classification of products under specific Chapter Headings was rejected by the Authority. The rejection was based on the grounds that the classification issue was already under consideration by the Central Excise Authority and that the manufacturing activities had already commenced, rendering the question of an advance ruling moot. Consequently, the application was deemed liable for rejection due to these reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 109 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48625</link>
      <description>The application seeking an advance ruling on the classification of products under specific Chapter Headings was rejected by the Authority. The rejection was based on the grounds that the classification issue was already under consideration by the Central Excise Authority and that the manufacturing activities had already commenced, rendering the question of an advance ruling moot. Consequently, the application was deemed liable for rejection due to these reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>