<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 89 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48623</link>
    <description>The Authority held that the imported coated tubes with filament, proposed by the applicant, are not classified as Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) and thus do not attract anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 138/2002-Cus. The jurisdictional Commissioner&#039;s objection based on a previous Tribunal decision was dismissed as irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 89 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48623</link>
      <description>The Authority held that the imported coated tubes with filament, proposed by the applicant, are not classified as Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) and thus do not attract anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 138/2002-Cus. The jurisdictional Commissioner&#039;s objection based on a previous Tribunal decision was dismissed as irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>