<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Business income on ad contracts estimated at 5%, cash deposits treated as covered to prevent double taxation</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94980</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the rejection of books and estimation of business income at 25% or 8% of undisclosed advertisement contract receipts was arbitrary and unsupported by comparable cases, industry data, or specific defects in accounts. Considering the assessee&#039;s past average profit margin of 3.5%, the thin-margin nature of advertisement agency business, and absence of contrary material, the Tribunal directed estimation of income at 5% of the relevant contract receipts. ITAT further accepted that cash deposits represented business receipts already embedded in the profit estimation; a separate addition would result in impermissible double taxation. Consequently, the assessment was modified and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:55:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:55:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Business income on ad contracts estimated at 5%, cash deposits treated as covered to prevent double taxation</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94980</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the rejection of books and estimation of business income at 25% or 8% of undisclosed advertisement contract receipts was arbitrary and unsupported by comparable cases, industry data, or specific defects in accounts. Considering the assessee&#039;s past average profit margin of 3.5%, the thin-margin nature of advertisement agency business, and absence of contrary material, the Tribunal directed estimation of income at 5% of the relevant contract receipts. ITAT further accepted that cash deposits represented business receipts already embedded in the profit estimation; a separate addition would result in impermissible double taxation. Consequently, the assessment was modified and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:55:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>