<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 760 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783220</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the adjudication order concerning alleged participation in a fraudulent diamond export syndicate, holding it non-maintainable in view of the efficacious statutory appellate remedy. The Court rejected the plea of violation of natural justice as vague and unsubstantiated, noting the case involved, at most, alleged inadequate opportunity without pleaded or demonstrated prejudice. It held that disputed factual issues and the petitioner&#039;s denial of involvement must be addressed in appeal, not in writ jurisdiction. The Court also inferred that the natural justice plea was raised primarily to circumvent the statutory pre-deposit requirement, and granted liberty to file an appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:26:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=871018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 760 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783220</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the adjudication order concerning alleged participation in a fraudulent diamond export syndicate, holding it non-maintainable in view of the efficacious statutory appellate remedy. The Court rejected the plea of violation of natural justice as vague and unsubstantiated, noting the case involved, at most, alleged inadequate opportunity without pleaded or demonstrated prejudice. It held that disputed factual issues and the petitioner&#039;s denial of involvement must be addressed in appeal, not in writ jurisdiction. The Court also inferred that the natural justice plea was raised primarily to circumvent the statutory pre-deposit requirement, and granted liberty to file an appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>