<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 787 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783247</link>
    <description>Employees&#039; contributions to provident fund and state insurance deposited after the statutory due date remained disallowable in processing under section 143(1)(a). Applying the principle from Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd., the admitted delay meant the adjustment was within the scope of the processing authority and did not warrant interference. The disallowance was upheld and the challenge to the intimation was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 787 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783247</link>
      <description>Employees&#039; contributions to provident fund and state insurance deposited after the statutory due date remained disallowable in processing under section 143(1)(a). Applying the principle from Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd., the admitted delay meant the adjustment was within the scope of the processing authority and did not warrant interference. The disallowance was upheld and the challenge to the intimation was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>