<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 100 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48617</link>
    <description>The Revision Application by M/s. Akansha Metals Pvt. Ltd. was successful in appealing the rejection of their rebate claim due to discrepancies in export documents. The government accepted their explanations for the discrepancies, emphasizing that minor lapses should be condoned and the substantive benefit should not be denied. The Original Authority was directed to verify the original documents to substantiate the explanations provided by the applicants. The judgment highlighted the significance of supporting rebate claims with documentary evidence, even in cases of discrepancies in export documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:47:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 100 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48617</link>
      <description>The Revision Application by M/s. Akansha Metals Pvt. Ltd. was successful in appealing the rejection of their rebate claim due to discrepancies in export documents. The government accepted their explanations for the discrepancies, emphasizing that minor lapses should be condoned and the substantive benefit should not be denied. The Original Authority was directed to verify the original documents to substantiate the explanations provided by the applicants. The judgment highlighted the significance of supporting rebate claims with documentary evidence, even in cases of discrepancies in export documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>