<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 798 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783258</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in respect of estimation of business income from advertisement services. It held that the AO&#039;s rejection of books and estimation of profit at 25% or 8% of undisclosed contract receipts was arbitrary, unsupported by comparable cases, industry data, or defects in accounts. Recognising that advertisement agencies operate on thin margins and noting the assessee&#039;s historical average margin of 3.5%, ITAT directed estimation of income at 5% of contract receipts as a fair and reasonable rate. ITAT further held that cash deposits were part of the same business receipts and deleted the separate addition to avoid double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 798 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783258</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in respect of estimation of business income from advertisement services. It held that the AO&#039;s rejection of books and estimation of profit at 25% or 8% of undisclosed contract receipts was arbitrary, unsupported by comparable cases, industry data, or defects in accounts. Recognising that advertisement agencies operate on thin margins and noting the assessee&#039;s historical average margin of 3.5%, ITAT directed estimation of income at 5% of contract receipts as a fair and reasonable rate. ITAT further held that cash deposits were part of the same business receipts and deleted the separate addition to avoid double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>