<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 808 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783268</link>
    <description>HC held that the assessee, a co-operative society, was entitled to deduction under s. 80P(2)(d) on interest income earned from deposits with co-operative banks registered as co-operative societies under the Sikkim Co-operative Societies Act, 1978. It ruled that s. 80P(4), which excludes co-operative banks from certain benefits, had been misapplied by the Tribunal and does not operate to deny deduction to a co-operative society earning interest from such banks. Distinguishing the SC ruling in Totgars&#039; Cooperative Sale Society Ltd., the HC followed the reasoning of a co-ordinate HC that Totgars, confined to s. 80P(2)(a)(i), was inapplicable. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 808 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783268</link>
      <description>HC held that the assessee, a co-operative society, was entitled to deduction under s. 80P(2)(d) on interest income earned from deposits with co-operative banks registered as co-operative societies under the Sikkim Co-operative Societies Act, 1978. It ruled that s. 80P(4), which excludes co-operative banks from certain benefits, had been misapplied by the Tribunal and does not operate to deny deduction to a co-operative society earning interest from such banks. Distinguishing the SC ruling in Totgars&#039; Cooperative Sale Society Ltd., the HC followed the reasoning of a co-ordinate HC that Totgars, confined to s. 80P(2)(a)(i), was inapplicable. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>