<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 809 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783269</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the assessee-corporation&#039;s appeal, holding it not entitled to deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) in respect of dividend income on shares, interest on short-term bank deposits, and service charges for monitoring Government sugar fund loans. Interpreting &quot;derived from&quot; narrowly, SC held that the deduction is confined to profits directly arising from the business of providing long-term finance, as statutorily defined, and not from ancillary or incidental business activities. Dividend on redeemable preference shares, interest from parking surplus funds, and agency service charges were found to lack the requisite first-degree nexus with long-term lending. The assessee&#039;s broader &quot;integrated business&quot; theory was expressly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 13:07:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 809 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783269</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the assessee-corporation&#039;s appeal, holding it not entitled to deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) in respect of dividend income on shares, interest on short-term bank deposits, and service charges for monitoring Government sugar fund loans. Interpreting &quot;derived from&quot; narrowly, SC held that the deduction is confined to profits directly arising from the business of providing long-term finance, as statutorily defined, and not from ancillary or incidental business activities. Dividend on redeemable preference shares, interest from parking surplus funds, and agency service charges were found to lack the requisite first-degree nexus with long-term lending. The assessee&#039;s broader &quot;integrated business&quot; theory was expressly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>