<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 96 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48614</link>
    <description>Recovery of duty and imposition of penalty for failure to produce export proof under a bond must be undertaken only by the authority with whom the bond was executed and accepted. Where exports were covered by bonds filed before the Maritime Commissioner, the factory-level officer could not independently assume jurisdiction to demand duty or levy penalty; the proper course was to intimate the bond-accepting authority for appropriate action. The earlier ruling on the same point was applied, and the remand order and appellate view were not interfered with, leaving the matter to be dealt with within the correct bond jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:41:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 96 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48614</link>
      <description>Recovery of duty and imposition of penalty for failure to produce export proof under a bond must be undertaken only by the authority with whom the bond was executed and accepted. Where exports were covered by bonds filed before the Maritime Commissioner, the factory-level officer could not independently assume jurisdiction to demand duty or levy penalty; the proper course was to intimate the bond-accepting authority for appropriate action. The earlier ruling on the same point was applied, and the remand order and appellate view were not interfered with, leaving the matter to be dealt with within the correct bond jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>