<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1850 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465235</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 was challenged on the basis that the PCIT had directed the Assessing Officer to pass a consequential order in light of the observations recorded in the revision order. The appeal was ultimately dismissed as withdrawn, so the text does not record any adjudication on the validity of the revision itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1850 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465235</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 was challenged on the basis that the PCIT had directed the Assessing Officer to pass a consequential order in light of the observations recorded in the revision order. The appeal was ultimately dismissed as withdrawn, so the text does not record any adjudication on the validity of the revision itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>