https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465244 HC allowed the writ petition, holding that the adjudication order passed under s. 74 of the UPGST Act was vitiated by violation of principles of natural justice, as no valid opportunity of personal hearing had been afforded. Relying on a prior coordinate Bench decision with an identical factual matrix, the HC held that the impugned order could not be sustained and that the existence of an alternative remedy did not bar exercise of writ jurisdiction in such circumstances. The impugned order dated 16.08.2023 was quashed, and the authority was directed to permit a fresh reply, grant personal hearing, and pass a reasoned order. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:42:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465244 HC allowed the writ petition, holding that the adjudication order passed under s. 74 of the UPGST Act was vitiated by violation of principles of natural justice, as no valid opportunity of personal hearing had been afforded. Relying on a prior coordinate Bench decision with an identical factual matrix, the HC held that the impugned order could not be sustained and that the existence of an alternative remedy did not bar exercise of writ jurisdiction in such circumstances. The impugned order dated 16.08.2023 was quashed, and the authority was directed to permit a fresh reply, grant personal hearing, and pass a reasoned order. Case-Laws GST Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465244