<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 110 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48602</link>
    <description>Where the liability of exported goods to central excise duty and the effect of exemption notifications had not been examined by the lower authorities, the matter required fresh consideration by the original authority. The document states that this duty-liability question was a preliminary and legally material issue because it directly affected the demand and penalty, and that an exemption notification must be treated as part of the enactment. It also notes that the claimant bears the burden of establishing entitlement. The appellate and original orders were therefore set aside and the dispute remanded for decision in accordance with law, leaving the substantive merits open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:59:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 110 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48602</link>
      <description>Where the liability of exported goods to central excise duty and the effect of exemption notifications had not been examined by the lower authorities, the matter required fresh consideration by the original authority. The document states that this duty-liability question was a preliminary and legally material issue because it directly affected the demand and penalty, and that an exemption notification must be treated as part of the enactment. It also notes that the claimant bears the burden of establishing entitlement. The appellate and original orders were therefore set aside and the dispute remanded for decision in accordance with law, leaving the substantive merits open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>