<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1944 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465209</link>
    <description>After commencement of trial, amendment of pleadings requires a specific showing of due diligence under the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC; vague assertions without particulars are insufficient, so the written statement amendment applications were refused. A simple money recovery claim, without a transaction involving mercantile documents or other features falling within Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, does not constitute a commercial dispute. On that footing, the suit was treated as an ordinary suit and Order XIII-A CPC summary judgment was not available, so the summary decree application failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 13:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1944 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465209</link>
      <description>After commencement of trial, amendment of pleadings requires a specific showing of due diligence under the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC; vague assertions without particulars are insufficient, so the written statement amendment applications were refused. A simple money recovery claim, without a transaction involving mercantile documents or other features falling within Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, does not constitute a commercial dispute. On that footing, the suit was treated as an ordinary suit and Order XIII-A CPC summary judgment was not available, so the summary decree application failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>