https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465210 A testamentary grant giving a female Hindu only restricted beneficial enjoyment, without a pre-existing right, remained governed by Section 14(2) of the Hindu Succession Act and did not enlarge into absolute ownership; the plaintiff therefore had no unrestricted power to alienate the estate. Share transfers and gifts in favour of two defendants were found prima facie tainted by undue influence, as the plaintiff was vulnerable and dependent and the surrounding documents did not show free consent. The civil suit was not barred by the Companies Act framework because it raised issues of title, validity of transfers, and will interpretation beyond summary rectification jurisdiction. Alleged suppression did not defeat interim relief, and restraint against alienation was granted pending final adjudication. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Dec 2025 11:18:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465210 A testamentary grant giving a female Hindu only restricted beneficial enjoyment, without a pre-existing right, remained governed by Section 14(2) of the Hindu Succession Act and did not enlarge into absolute ownership; the plaintiff therefore had no unrestricted power to alienate the estate. Share transfers and gifts in favour of two defendants were found prima facie tainted by undue influence, as the plaintiff was vulnerable and dependent and the surrounding documents did not show free consent. The civil suit was not barred by the Companies Act framework because it raised issues of title, validity of transfers, and will interpretation beyond summary rectification jurisdiction. Alleged suppression did not defeat interim relief, and restraint against alienation was granted pending final adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465210