<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1557 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465212</link>
    <description>An order refusing rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) is appealable as a judgment under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, so the Division Bench could examine it. A plaint may be rejected only when the bar of law is apparent from the plaint itself; where rejection depends on disputed facts, including whether the term sheet and related documents created a binding agreement, the issue cannot be decided at the threshold without evidence. The commercial nature of the dispute and objections based on pre-institution procedure also depended on that unresolved factual question, so the plaint was not liable to be rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 13:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1557 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465212</link>
      <description>An order refusing rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) is appealable as a judgment under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, so the Division Bench could examine it. A plaint may be rejected only when the bar of law is apparent from the plaint itself; where rejection depends on disputed facts, including whether the term sheet and related documents created a binding agreement, the issue cannot be decided at the threshold without evidence. The commercial nature of the dispute and objections based on pre-institution procedure also depended on that unresolved factual question, so the plaint was not liable to be rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>