<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs body upholds polyester fabric reclassification, confirms confiscation u/ss 111(l),(m) and penalties under 112,114A,114AA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94937</link>
    <description>CESTAT upheld reclassification of the imported goods as 100% polyester knitted cut fabric under CTI 6001 92 00 (&quot;others - of man-made fibres&quot;), rejecting classification as long pile fabric under CTI 6001 10 90. The consequential duty demand based on such reclassification was sustained. In view of substantial mis-declaration of quantity and nature of goods, and presence of undeclared items, confiscation under sections 111(l) and 111(m) of the Customs Act was affirmed. Penalties on the importer-firm and its main partner under sections 112, 114A and 114AA were also upheld. The impugned order was confirmed in entirety and both appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:37:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs body upholds polyester fabric reclassification, confirms confiscation u/ss 111(l),(m) and penalties under 112,114A,114AA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94937</link>
      <description>CESTAT upheld reclassification of the imported goods as 100% polyester knitted cut fabric under CTI 6001 92 00 (&quot;others - of man-made fibres&quot;), rejecting classification as long pile fabric under CTI 6001 10 90. The consequential duty demand based on such reclassification was sustained. In view of substantial mis-declaration of quantity and nature of goods, and presence of undeclared items, confiscation under sections 111(l) and 111(m) of the Customs Act was affirmed. Penalties on the importer-firm and its main partner under sections 112, 114A and 114AA were also upheld. The impugned order was confirmed in entirety and both appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:37:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>