<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 759 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783219</link>
    <description>HC held the writ petition maintainable despite availability of a statutory appeal, invoking the exception for breach of natural justice. The petitioner produced email and postal evidence showing a reply to the show cause notice, while the impugned order was passed on the erroneous premise that no reply had been filed. The HC found that complete non-consideration of the reply constituted a violation of principles of natural justice and fair play, vitiating the adjudication. Consequently, the order-in-original was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration of the show cause notice after duly considering the petitioner&#039;s reply. The petition was disposed of by remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 08:56:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 759 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783219</link>
      <description>HC held the writ petition maintainable despite availability of a statutory appeal, invoking the exception for breach of natural justice. The petitioner produced email and postal evidence showing a reply to the show cause notice, while the impugned order was passed on the erroneous premise that no reply had been filed. The HC found that complete non-consideration of the reply constituted a violation of principles of natural justice and fair play, vitiating the adjudication. Consequently, the order-in-original was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration of the show cause notice after duly considering the petitioner&#039;s reply. The petition was disposed of by remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>