<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 719 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783179</link>
    <description>HC held that customs authorities&#039; failure to pass speaking orders on enhancement of value of imported goods, despite a binding remand by Commissioner (Appeals), amounted to gross dereliction of statutory duty and violation of principles of natural justice. Relying on prior precedent, HC reiterated that non-passing or unreasonable delay in passing speaking orders cannot be used to frustrate the importer&#039;s right to effective appellate redress. HC imposed costs on the concerned customs officers, directed them to grant the importer a personal hearing if necessary, and mandated issuance and communication of reasoned speaking orders within two months. The petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 08:55:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 719 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783179</link>
      <description>HC held that customs authorities&#039; failure to pass speaking orders on enhancement of value of imported goods, despite a binding remand by Commissioner (Appeals), amounted to gross dereliction of statutory duty and violation of principles of natural justice. Relying on prior precedent, HC reiterated that non-passing or unreasonable delay in passing speaking orders cannot be used to frustrate the importer&#039;s right to effective appellate redress. HC imposed costs on the concerned customs officers, directed them to grant the importer a personal hearing if necessary, and mandated issuance and communication of reasoned speaking orders within two months. The petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>