<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 101 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48588</link>
    <description>Section 35A(3) permits the Commissioner (Appeals) to make necessary inquiry and deal with matters arising from the show cause notice and the appealed order, not only the exact grounds set out in the appeal memorandum. The appellate limitation was therefore read broadly, and the narrower construction urged by the applicants was rejected. Rebate entitlement also required strict proof of correlation between the exported fabrics and the claimed transactions, along with evidence of ownership, chain of dealings, and timely filing. On the record, the applicants failed to establish those links or the prescribed limitation, so the rebate claims were not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 101 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48588</link>
      <description>Section 35A(3) permits the Commissioner (Appeals) to make necessary inquiry and deal with matters arising from the show cause notice and the appealed order, not only the exact grounds set out in the appeal memorandum. The appellate limitation was therefore read broadly, and the narrower construction urged by the applicants was rejected. Rebate entitlement also required strict proof of correlation between the exported fabrics and the claimed transactions, along with evidence of ownership, chain of dealings, and timely filing. On the record, the applicants failed to establish those links or the prescribed limitation, so the rebate claims were not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>