https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48587 An exemption under Notification No. 9/2003 could not be partially revoked after the option had been exercised, because the benefit was expressly conditional on the option not being withdrawn during the remaining part of the financial year. Having accepted the exemption, the petitioner remained bound by its terms. As no illegality in the impugned order was shown, the High Court declined interference and dismissed the writ petition as lacking merit. en-us Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:56:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48587 An exemption under Notification No. 9/2003 could not be partially revoked after the option had been exercised, because the benefit was expressly conditional on the option not being withdrawn during the remaining part of the financial year. Having accepted the exemption, the petitioner remained bound by its terms. As no illegality in the impugned order was shown, the High Court declined interference and dismissed the writ petition as lacking merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48587