https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465190 A dispute based on alleged unauthorised use of broadcast content remained a commercial dispute because the intellectual property claims were central and the defamation and disparagement allegations were intertwined with that underlying transaction. The commercial court therefore had jurisdiction. On interim relief, the court recognised broadcast reproduction rights and the availability of fair dealing for criticism, review, or reporting of current events, but held that whether the impugned material was protected fair dealing or actionable copying depended on disputed facts requiring trial. Mandatory takedown and restraining relief were refused at the interlocutory stage, with damages left as the adequate remedy if the plaintiff ultimately succeeded. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Dec 2025 19:13:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465190 A dispute based on alleged unauthorised use of broadcast content remained a commercial dispute because the intellectual property claims were central and the defamation and disparagement allegations were intertwined with that underlying transaction. The commercial court therefore had jurisdiction. On interim relief, the court recognised broadcast reproduction rights and the availability of fair dealing for criticism, review, or reporting of current events, but held that whether the impugned material was protected fair dealing or actionable copying depended on disputed facts requiring trial. Mandatory takedown and restraining relief were refused at the interlocutory stage, with damages left as the adequate remedy if the plaintiff ultimately succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465190