https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465191 A dispute must satisfy the statutory definition of a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before it can be treated as a commercial suit; mere filing of a recovery action or the involvement of bank accounts is insufficient. A claim based on alleged embezzlement, forgery, falsification of accounts, and fraudulent diversion of funds by an employee and others was held to be fraud-based recovery litigation, not an ordinary commercial transaction carrying the necessary commercial flavour or connected with mercantile documents. The request to review the earlier order and convert the civil suit into a commercial suit was therefore rejected. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 16:23:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465191 A dispute must satisfy the statutory definition of a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before it can be treated as a commercial suit; mere filing of a recovery action or the involvement of bank accounts is insufficient. A claim based on alleged embezzlement, forgery, falsification of accounts, and fraudulent diversion of funds by an employee and others was held to be fraud-based recovery litigation, not an ordinary commercial transaction carrying the necessary commercial flavour or connected with mercantile documents. The request to review the earlier order and convert the civil suit into a commercial suit was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465191