https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465194 A dispute based on a share purchase agreement, where the plaintiff was not a shareholder, was treated as outside the category of commercial disputes arising from shareholders agreements under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court distinguished a shareholder agreement, which regulates internal rights and obligations among shareholders, from a share purchase agreement, which governs sale of shares between buyer and seller. On that reasoning, the plaint was not maintainable before the Commercial Court and should have been returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for re-allotment before the competent civil court. en-us Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Dec 2025 19:13:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465194 A dispute based on a share purchase agreement, where the plaintiff was not a shareholder, was treated as outside the category of commercial disputes arising from shareholders agreements under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court distinguished a shareholder agreement, which regulates internal rights and obligations among shareholders, from a share purchase agreement, which governs sale of shares between buyer and seller. On that reasoning, the plaint was not maintainable before the Commercial Court and should have been returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for re-allotment before the competent civil court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465194