https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465195 SC allowed the appeals filed by the original defendant, holding that the suits seeking cancellation of registered sale deeds were ex facie barred by limitation. The Court found that the plaintiffs instituted suit nearly ten years after execution of the impugned sale deeds, despite prior litigation referring to the same transaction, and attempted, by clever drafting, to present the claims as within time. Applying Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, SC held the plaints liable to rejection as barred by law. The common judgment of the HC dismissing civil revision petitions and the Trial Court orders refusing to reject the plaints were quashed and set aside. en-us Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 11:26:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465195 SC allowed the appeals filed by the original defendant, holding that the suits seeking cancellation of registered sale deeds were ex facie barred by limitation. The Court found that the plaintiffs instituted suit nearly ten years after execution of the impugned sale deeds, despite prior litigation referring to the same transaction, and attempted, by clever drafting, to present the claims as within time. Applying Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, SC held the plaints liable to rejection as barred by law. The common judgment of the HC dismissing civil revision petitions and the Trial Court orders refusing to reject the plaints were quashed and set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465195