<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1726 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465198</link>
    <description>The ITAT Visakhapatnam held that an assessment framed u/s 143(3) on the foundation of an unsigned notice u/s 143(2) is invalid. It ruled that a notice lacking the Assessing Officer&#039;s signature is not a valid statutory notice and thus cannot confer jurisdiction to complete scrutiny assessment. Since the jurisdictional precondition of a validly issued notice u/s 143(2) was not satisfied, all consequential assessment proceedings were vitiated. The assessment order was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 14:35:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1726 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465198</link>
      <description>The ITAT Visakhapatnam held that an assessment framed u/s 143(3) on the foundation of an unsigned notice u/s 143(2) is invalid. It ruled that a notice lacking the Assessing Officer&#039;s signature is not a valid statutory notice and thus cannot confer jurisdiction to complete scrutiny assessment. Since the jurisdictional precondition of a validly issued notice u/s 143(2) was not satisfied, all consequential assessment proceedings were vitiated. The assessment order was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>