<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1748 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465199</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the orders denying deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest from fixed deposits and remanded the matter to the AO. It held that the AO and CIT(A) failed to properly examine the assessee&#039;s submissions and documentary evidence that credit facilities and investments were confined to its members, including associate and nominal members, and whether it functioned as a co-operative society eligible under s.80P. The AO was directed to reconsider the claim in light of the evidence and applicable judicial precedents. The ITAT also remanded the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 57(iii), directing the AO to verify the nexus of proportionate expenses with taxable interest income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 17:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1748 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465199</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the orders denying deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest from fixed deposits and remanded the matter to the AO. It held that the AO and CIT(A) failed to properly examine the assessee&#039;s submissions and documentary evidence that credit facilities and investments were confined to its members, including associate and nominal members, and whether it functioned as a co-operative society eligible under s.80P. The AO was directed to reconsider the claim in light of the evidence and applicable judicial precedents. The ITAT also remanded the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 57(iii), directing the AO to verify the nexus of proportionate expenses with taxable interest income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>